|
Dr.
Frisch’s E-News
A Publication of Dr. Glenn Frisch
4137
Woodland Road
•
Lexington
,
MN
• 55014
763-784-5304 •
763-784-5349 (fax) •
drfrisch@qwest.net • ©
2006, Dr. Frisch. All Rights Reserved.
|

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
I hope that each of you had a wonderful Holiday
Season. The Holidays move so fast that we should actually sit down,
take a deep breath and reflect from time to time.
With that said, let's move on to the New
Year!
(Nice segue, huh?)
The upcoming year should be an exciting one in health
care, but it will not be without a few pitfalls. There are continual
strides being made by some groups to restrict your ability to see the
doctor of your choice. These groups have even proposed bills to
try and force your doctor to treat you the way they deem necessary.
They are trying to sneak it into the HIPPA privacy laws. That is a FEDERAL
PROGRAM. If these groups are successful at keeping
your health care dollars through legislation, you will receive little or
no care for your injuries, and if your doctor needs to step outside of
their guidelines, for any reason, he or she will be prosecuted under
Federal Law as a criminal! If that happens you may be asking
your mechanic or hair stylist for health care advice because your doctor
will probably be doing something else. The stakes are that high! As
always, I will keep all of you posted on breaking health care news via
email, so if your email changes, please let me know. In
spite of the negative issues of health care, there are positives as
well. There has been considerable research published recently in
relation to nutrition and health. I think that science is truly
beginning to look at common sense approaches to the obesity problem in
this country. I have brought some of this research to you in this
news letter. Additionally, the mind-body relationship
in trauma, injury and metabolic processes continues to be supported by
solid medical research. I have been establishing treatment protocols
for treating things like allergies, chronic pain, fibromyalgia and even
circulatory problems for the past several years. I am happy happy to
say that, so far, it looks like I was right. The brain, when
stimulated properly, is able to alter body function on a consistent
basis. I will be bringing you more information about that next
month. Until then, enjoy this issue of Dr. Frisch's ENews
and make sure to start the New Year with at least one resolution! Dr.
Frisch |
The Success of New Years Resolutions?

What is it about the coming new year that encourages
people to make promises to themselves regarding faults or bad behaviors? I often wonder why someone needs a starting point to begin
anything. If we know that we are messy, somewhat lazy, or
unmotivated, why don't we just begin the changes immediately? Why do
we need a projected starting point like January 1st? A research
study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology may help shed some
light on why resolutions may be of benefit1.
The study was performed at the University of
Scranton. It measured the differences of problem-solving success when those who made resolutions were compared with those who
didn't make resolutions, even though they had a problem to change as
well. The problems were varied, with the most common complaints
being weight loss, exercise and quitting smoking. This sounds
familiar, doesn't it?
A sample size of 282 people were followed 6 months into a
new year. About half of the people made New Year's resolutions,
while the other half did not. The two groups of people were similar
in demographic characteristics, problems and behavioral goals.
At 6 months, 46% of those individuals who had made a
resolution were successful at achieving their goal, while only 4% of the
individuals who did not make a resolution were successful at changing a
similar, undesirable behavior.
What Does This Mean?....
The results of this study indicate that
when an individual plans for a change, structures a way to achieve it, and
then implements the action, their brain and body work differently that
some who just wants a change. The well thought out resolution
invokes a thought and behavior process that does not rely on
emotional stimulus, like 'rah, rah' hype, or constant thoughts about the
change (self-generated awareness).
"Actions Speak Louder Than
Words"
The person who has a plan, sets a target
date and then begins action will have a greater success rate than someone
who wants the same change, but doesn't implement a plan. The
brain process that allows the change stimulates 'action' mechanisms,
rather than just 'thought and emotional desire' mechanisms.
This study was a pretty good look at why we make
resolutions and even why they might work. This research, however,
makes me wonder if there are people who are constantly self-motivated and
live their lives in the 'thought-to-action mode'? What is different
about them when compared to the average Joe or Jane on the street?
Wouldn't that be a nice research study for 2006? I think that we
could all benefit a bit from that data!
1. Norcross, J C, Mrykalo, M S, Blagys, M
D. 2002. Auld lang syne: success predictors, change processes, and
self-reported outcomes of New Year's resolvers and nonresolvers. J Clin
Psychol. Apr 58(4). 397-405.
|
|
Metabolism and Obesity

"High Carbs, Low Carbs, No Carbs, High Protein,
Low Protein, Low Fat, and No Fat. Who is right and where will it all
end?"
I'm not sure that there will be an end to the argument.
I suspect that people have talked about how to properly eat for multitudes
of generations. One thing is becoming obvious, however. When
there is a profit to be made, someone will fill that void.
I have been a long-time fan of higher protein and lower
carbohydrate eating. If you noticed, I did not say 'diet'. I
personally hate the word diet as it implies deprivation and
hardship. An eating plan is about consistency and how you want to
live your life, not what is necessarily easy or fast.
A recent British review (2005) published in the
International Journal of Obesity discussed the effect of
low-carbohydrate eating on energy metabolism1.
Studies were reviewed in an attempt to determine whether
low-carbohydrate diets were more beneficial at long-term weight loss when
compared to low-fat diets for the treatment of obesity. The results
were somewhat surprising!
Studies using low-carbohydrate diets showed a more rapid
weight loss in a shorter time period than did low-fat diets. After
12 months, however, there was no difference between the low-carbohydrate
and low-fat diets on weight loss!
Both styles of eating reduced risk factors for heart
disease. The low-carbohydrate diets did reduce serum triglycerides
and increase HDL (good) cholesterol levels when compared to the low-fat
diets, but both were equal in lowering blood pressure, insulin
sensitivity, and LDL (bad) cholesterol.
This means that although a more rapid weight loss may
occur with the low-carbohydrate diet, the low fat diet is effective
too. Consistency is what counts. A temporary diet will only
lead to temporary weight loss. Changing how you eat and sticking
with it is a better indicator of success.
1. Erlanson-Albertsson, C, Mei, J. 2005.
The effect of low-carbohydrate on energy metabolism. Int J Obesity.
Sept 29. S26-30.
|
Obesity Slows Body Fat Use
It has been long-contended by over-weight
people that they burn less calories and have a 'slower metabolism' than
their thin counterparts. They may not be all wrong in that
assumption.
Over-weight and obese individuals are often
looked at with a raised eyebrow, and their desire to lose weight
suspect. This assumption, however, is wrong if some of the recent
research is correct!
In December of 2005, research performed at
the University of Alberta was published in the Journal of Endocrinology
and Metabolism1. This research evaluated fat-oxidation in
obese men, compared to that of lean men. Fat-oxidation is what burns
fat, both during exercise and at rest.

The hypothesis of the research was that obese men would
have a 'blunted' (slowed) fat-oxidation, post-exercise. If correct,
there would be a higher Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER), blunted
Growth Hormone, and increased Cortisol levels. Growth Hormone
promotes energy expenditure and increased Cortisol means less energy (fat)
burned.
The 30-39 year old male subjects completed baseline and
vigorous exercise routines for 2 hours each session. At the end of
each session, RER, Growth Hormone, Cortisol, core body temperatures, and
enzyme activity were recorded.
The results indicated that at rest, there were no
differences of measures between obese and lean men. In contrast,
however, during exercise and after exercise obese men showed
increased levels of Cortisol and blunted levels of Growth Hormone.
This means that the obese men were unable to burn energy at the same rate
as lean men.
"Their Bodies protected fat stores."
If this sounds disheartening, it is! Those people
who are obese must work twice as hard to burn half as much. Once a
level of weight has been reached, however, the metabolism rates seem to
improve. This study did not touch on the topic of genetic, 'set
points' for metabolism, but this research was enlightening.
"Play Hard!"
1. Wong, T, Harber, V. 2005. Lower excess
postexercise oxygen consumption and altered growth hormone and cortisol
response to exercise in obese men. 2005. J Clin Endocrinol Metab Dec 6. |
|
Aerobic Exercise Reduces Pain

I'm sure that many of you reading this are old enough to
remember when heating pads were recommended for pain, braces and slings
were the first choice for injury, and any type of arthritis needed
rest. A doctor might have been run out of town for telling a
patient with Osteoarthritis to get off of his or her butt and start
exercising, but that is exactly what the doctor should have prescribed!
Aerobic exercise is not just for your heart and
lungs. It benefits the musculoskeletal system as well.
Remember, muscle are organs and they require fresh blood and oxygen to
function properly.
A 2005 research study performed at Stanford University1.evaluated
the relationship of aerobic exercise in 866 senior citizens and their
levels of reported pain. This was a 14-year longitudinal study with
some intriguing results.
Runners' Association member (n=492) and community controls
(n=374) were initially compared and then statistically analyzed yearly for
pain measures. There were subcategories within the runner's group
that evaluated former runners (who no longer ran) as compared to those who
still ran. At the end of 14 years the ages of the subjects ranged
from 62-76 years.
The seniors in this study were not lolly-gagging in their
approach to running. They averaged 314 minutes of aerobic exercise
per week, and traveled, on average, 26 miles per week. This was in
comparison to the community controls who reported exercising, on average,
123 minutes per week and ran only about 2 miles per week.
I'm old. I can't work out that hard!"
The results of this study indicated that long-term,
physically active seniors had 25% less musculoskeletal complaints of pain
than did their inactive counterparts. These findings continue to
solidify the fact that men and women over 55 years of age can be
vigorously active. It not only helps them live healthier lives, but
they have less pain throughout their lives as well.
"The human body, when worked hard, is the
only machine that looks better and works more efficiently for longer
periods of time."
1. Bruce, B, Fries, J F, Lubeck, D P. 2005.
Aerobic exercise and its impact on musculoskeletal pain in older adults: a
14 year prospective, longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther. 7(6):R
1263-70.
|
A New Nutritional Approach
| |
..


Greens First is a
Doctor-developed, and research-supported
method of delivering 'Super Food'
nutrition to your body each and every day!
Each serving has the antioxidant
power of 10+ fruits and vegetables!
Vitamins are enzymes that help your
body process the food that you
ingest. The poorer the food, the
more the need for vitamins to gain
nutritional value.
What do you think
happens when the nutrition is a 'Super
Food' to start with? |
|
|
|
Those of you reading this who are patients at the clinic
have been hearing me talk about 'Super Foods' for quite some time.
I have actually been evaluating the Greens First line for nearly a
year. I am impressed with their products.
Not only will users of Greens First be getting
great nutrition, it is affordable and should actually lessen the need
for added supplementation. That means less hassle to get
what you were really after in the first place.
I will begin carrying this nutritional line in January
of 2006. I encourage anyone currently taking vitamins and other
natural supplementation to seriously look at this product. I don't
think that you will be disappointed!
Doctors for Nutrition also carries the Greens First
alternative called Red Alert...same nutrition...fruitier!
I always get excited at the start of a new year. Change
is good! I look forward to serving each of you in 2006.
Remember, you can always call or email me with any questions that you
may have.
Take care,
Dr. Frisch |
|